Staff Posts

Hey Google: Stop unnecessarily collecting and retaining user’s location data

After the fall of Roe v. Wade, Google publicly committed to protecting user privacy, but research shows it isn’t meeting its commitments to protect the data of people seeking reproductive healthcare.

Ayanna Williams
Ayanna Williams,
Dec 22, 2022

25 Massachusetts Avenue is the address to Google’s Washington D.C. office. And on December 5th, Accountable Tech and Defending Rights and Dissent took a visit to hand deliver 160,000 petition signatures demanding Google stop its location data retention practices. 

How it All Started 

In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, Google announced new policies to protect people’s abortion related data  specifically pledging to delete data entries from location history soon after users visit certain sensitive locations like abortion clinics. While some applauded Google’s new approach to privacy protection, we had questions.

In an attempt to gain clarity on how this new policy would work, we sent a letter to Google demanding answers. Months passed without a response, so we set out to find the answers on our own.

Testing Google’s location policy 

Two Accountable Tech staff members, Giliann Karon and Aditi Ramesh, ran an experiment to test if Google’s new policy had truly been implemented. Using two newly purchased Google Android phones and Google Maps to find directions to Planned Parenthoods in both Pennsylvania and California, Giliann and Aditi set out to test if Google retains location history for people searching for and visiting Planned Parenthood locations. 

The findings of the experiment — detailed in this report — revealed that Google still retained user location data when visiting an abortion clinic, months after the July policy update. Searches for directions to abortion clinics on Google Maps, as well as the route taken to visit a Planned Parenthood location, remained stored in the Android phone’s Google activity timeline for weeks after the travel occurred. 

This means, the data which users were led to expect to delete automatically – as the company promised – could endanger those seeking reproductive care, especially in states that have banned abortions. 

Thousands of Signatures Delivered to Google’s Door

We requested a meeting with Google to discuss our concerns about the implementation — or lack thereof — of its new policy as well as the troubling findings of our research. Despite numerous emails over the course of several weeks with Google employees who each insisted they had passed on our request to the “right team”, a meeting never took place. So with a collective 160,000 signatures on a petition demanding Google stop retaining sensitive location data, we showed up to Google’s office in D.C. to request a meeting in person. We were turned away at the door. 

Several boxes of signatures and a brief protest later, there still has been no acknowledgement from Google. 

More Staff Posts

A Look Inside Our #BlockTwitter Campaign
Giliann Karon
Giliann Karon,
Sep 25, 2023

Why Twitter’s block button is so crucial for marginalized communities to protect themselves from targeted harassment.

Tech accountability victories through kids safety | Q&A with youth leader Zamaan Qureshi
Alison Rice
Alison Rice,
Aug 31, 2023

Up against a formidable foe – Big Tech – I chatted with youth leader Zamaan Qureshi about the paths to victory.

Disinformation Station Training at Netroots | Q&A with Jaya Savita Aiyer of UltraViolet
Kenya Juarez
Kenya Juarez,
Aug 11, 2023

At Netroots Nation 2023, I attended "Disinformation Station," a tech-focused training by Jaya Savita Aiyer from UltraViolet, exploring technology's role in activism and disinformation.

Join the fight to rein in Big Tech.

Big Tech companies are some of the most powerful and profitable companies in history, presenting new threats to the safety of communities and the health of democracy. We’re taking them on through legislation, regulation and direct advocacy.